Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSMX vs VMVAX
CFSMX vs VMVAX Comparison
Open Charts CFSMX vs VMVAX
Clarkston Partners Founders
Price$13.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets918.16M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Admiral
Price$89.16
Change-$0.19 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.03B
CFSMX vs VMVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSMX vs. VMVAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSMX is a Hold and VMVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMVAX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. CFSMX (918M). VMVAX pays higher dividends than CFSMX: VMVAX (2.15) vs CFSMX (0.52). CFSMX was incepted earlier than VMVAX: CFSMX (10 years) vs VMVAX (14 years). CFSMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VMVAX (0.07). CFSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. VMVAX (19.00). VMVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSMX: VMVAX (3000) vs CFSMX (100000000). VMVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.45 vs. CFSMX (-4.38). VMVAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.70 vs. CFSMX (7.53).
| CFSMX | VMVAX | CFSMX / VMVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.07 | 1,214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.07 | 1,257% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.474 | 6.714 | -96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 3000 | 3,333,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 918M | 32B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 2.15 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.38 | 4.45 | -98% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.57 | 30.22 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.53 | 66.70 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.21 | 102.84 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement