Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSMX vs VMVAX
CFSMX vs VMVAX Comparison
Open Charts CFSMX vs VMVAX
Clarkston Partners Founders
Price$13.70
Change-$0.10 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets964.17M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Admiral
Price$88.41
Change-$0.51 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.04B
CFSMX vs VMVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSMX vs. VMVAX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSMX is a Buy and VMVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMVAX has more cash in the bank: 31B vs. CFSMX (964M). VMVAX pays higher dividends than CFSMX: VMVAX (2.22) vs CFSMX (0.55). CFSMX was incepted earlier than VMVAX: CFSMX (10 years) vs VMVAX (14 years). CFSMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VMVAX (0.07). CFSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. VMVAX (19.00). VMVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSMX: VMVAX (3000) vs CFSMX (100000000). VMVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.84 vs. CFSMX (-0.38). VMVAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.73 vs. CFSMX (8.02).
| CFSMX | VMVAX | CFSMX / VMVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.07 | 1,214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.07 | 1,257% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.959 | 6.201 | -80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 3000 | 3,333,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 964M | 31B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 2.22 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.38 | 9.84 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.14 | 19.24 | -94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.02 | 66.73 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement