Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSMX vs VMVAX
CFSMX vs VMVAX Comparison
Open Charts CFSMX vs VMVAX
Clarkston Partners Founders
Price$13.66
Change+$0.07 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets897.25M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Admiral
Price$90.33
Change+$0.41 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.47B
CFSMX vs VMVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSMX vs. VMVAX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSMX is a Hold and VMVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMVAX has more cash in the bank: 32.5B vs. CFSMX (897M). VMVAX pays higher dividends than CFSMX: VMVAX (2.17) vs CFSMX (0.54). CFSMX was incepted earlier than VMVAX: CFSMX (10 years) vs VMVAX (14 years). CFSMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VMVAX (0.07). CFSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. VMVAX (19.00). VMVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSMX: VMVAX (3000) vs CFSMX (100000000). VMVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.83 vs. CFSMX (-7.48). VMVAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.85 vs. CFSMX (5.10).
| CFSMX | VMVAX | CFSMX / VMVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.07 | 1,214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.07 | 1,257% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.405 | 7.426 | -86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 3000 | 3,333,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 897M | 32.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 2.17 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.48 | 2.83 | -264% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.94 | 37.89 | -24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.10 | 63.85 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.53 | 99.62 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement