Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSTX vs VSGBX
CFSTX vs VSGBX Comparison
Open Charts CFSTX vs VSGBX
CFSTX vs VSGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSTX vs. VSGBX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSTX is a Hold and VSGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSGBX has more cash in the bank: 4.49B vs. CFSTX (25.5M). VSGBX pays higher dividends than CFSTX: VSGBX (3.85) vs CFSTX (2.56). CFSTX was incepted earlier than VSGBX: CFSTX (32 years) vs VSGBX (38 years). CFSTX (1.30) is less costly to investors than VSGBX (0.20). VSGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 398.00 vs. CFSTX (39.00). CFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSGBX: CFSTX (1000) vs VSGBX (3000). CFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.32 vs. VSGBX (-0.10). CFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 5.13 vs. VSGBX (-6.26).
| CFSTX | VSGBX | CFSTX / VSGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.20 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.20 | 650% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.429 | -0.966 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.5M | 4.49B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 3.85 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.32 | -0.10 | -2,376% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.91 | 2.60 | 458% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.13 | -6.26 | -82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.24 | -1.40 | -945% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement