Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSTX vs VSGBX
CFSTX vs VSGBX Comparison
Open Charts CFSTX vs VSGBX
CFSTX vs VSGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSTX vs. VSGBX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSTX is a Hold and VSGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSGBX has more cash in the bank: 4.47B vs. CFSTX (22M). VSGBX pays higher dividends than CFSTX: VSGBX (3.85) vs CFSTX (2.63). CFSTX was incepted earlier than VSGBX: CFSTX (32 years) vs VSGBX (39 years). CFSTX (1.30) is less costly to investors than VSGBX (0.20). VSGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 398.00 vs. CFSTX (39.00). CFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSGBX: CFSTX (1000) vs VSGBX (3000). CFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.13 vs. VSGBX (-0.39). CFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 5.16 vs. VSGBX (-6.54).
| CFSTX | VSGBX | CFSTX / VSGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.20 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.20 | 650% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.502 | -1.353 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22M | 4.47B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 3.85 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.13 | -0.39 | -547% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.56 | 2.30 | 502% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.16 | -6.54 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.04 | -1.88 | -693% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers