Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFVLX vs RMEBX
CFVLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CFVLX vs RMEBX
CFVLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFVLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFVLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CFVLX (223M). CFVLX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CFVLX (1.62) vs RMEBX (1.00). CFVLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CFVLX (29 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CFVLX (0.69). CFVLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFVLX: RMEBX (250) vs CFVLX (1000). CFVLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.86 vs. RMEBX (7.56). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. CFVLX (15.98).
| CFVLX | RMEBX | CFVLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.455 | 9.246 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 223M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 1.00 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.86 | 7.56 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.83 | 31.88 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.98 | 36.13 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.18 | 89.32 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers