Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWAX vs ICBMX
CFWAX vs ICBMX Comparison
Open Charts CFWAX vs ICBMX
CFWAX vs ICBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWAX vs. ICBMX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWAX is a Hold and ICBMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFWAX has more cash in the bank: 565M vs. ICBMX (132M). ICBMX pays higher dividends than CFWAX: ICBMX (1.29) vs CFWAX (0.92). CFWAX was incepted earlier than ICBMX: CFWAX (18 years) vs ICBMX (29 years). ICBMX (1.31) and CFWAX (1.29) have similar cost to investors . ICBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 154.00 vs. CFWAX (24.00). CFWAX (1000) and ICBMX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ICBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.94 vs. CFWAX (3.96). ICBMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.56 vs. CFWAX (13.35).
| CFWAX | ICBMX | CFWAX / ICBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.31 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.31 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.417 | 16.980 | 32% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 565M | 132M | 428% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.29 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.96 | 19.94 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.58 | 24.26 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.35 | 31.56 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.42 | 83.13 | 112% |