Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWAX vs ICBMX
CFWAX vs ICBMX Comparison
Open Charts CFWAX vs ICBMX
CFWAX vs ICBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWAX vs. ICBMX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWAX is a Hold and ICBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFWAX has more cash in the bank: 559M vs. ICBMX (141M). ICBMX pays higher dividends than CFWAX: ICBMX (1.27) vs CFWAX (0.92). CFWAX was incepted earlier than ICBMX: CFWAX (18 years) vs ICBMX (29 years). ICBMX (1.31) and CFWAX (1.29) have similar cost to investors . ICBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 154.00 vs. CFWAX (24.00). CFWAX (1000) and ICBMX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ICBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.73 vs. CFWAX (2.37). ICBMX return over 5 years is better than : 48.34 vs. CFWAX (9.87).
| CFWAX | ICBMX | CFWAX / ICBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.31 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.31 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.205 | 25.553 | 24% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 559M | 141M | 396% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.27 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.37 | 28.73 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.73 | 33.82 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.87 | 48.34 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.76 | 94.59 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement