Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWAX vs RYBCX
CFWAX vs RYBCX Comparison
Open Charts CFWAX vs RYBCX
CFWAX vs RYBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWAX vs. RYBCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWAX is a Hold and RYBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFWAX has more cash in the bank: 552M vs. RYBCX (35.4M). CFWAX pays higher dividends than RYBCX: CFWAX (0.93) vs RYBCX (0.72). CFWAX was incepted earlier than RYBCX: CFWAX (18 years) vs RYBCX (25 years). RYBCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than CFWAX (1.29). RYBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. CFWAX (24.00). CFWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBCX: CFWAX (1000) vs RYBCX (2500). RYBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. CFWAX (-1.34). RYBCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.03 vs. CFWAX (5.40).
| CFWAX | RYBCX | CFWAX / RYBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 2.38 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 2.43 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.531 | 12.851 | 27% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 552M | 35.4M | 1,559% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.72 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.34 | 8.11 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.44 | 20.85 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.40 | 14.03 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.62 | 83.36 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement