Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWAX vs RYBMX
CFWAX vs RYBMX Comparison
Open Charts CFWAX vs RYBMX
CFWAX vs RYBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWAX vs. RYBMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWAX is a Hold and RYBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFWAX has more cash in the bank: 565M vs. RYBMX (37.8M). CFWAX pays higher dividends than RYBMX: CFWAX (0.92) vs RYBMX (0.62). CFWAX was incepted earlier than RYBMX: CFWAX (18 years) vs RYBMX (22 years). RYBMX (1.69) is less costly to investors than CFWAX (1.29). RYBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. CFWAX (24.00). CFWAX initial investment is less costly to investors than RYBMX (5%) vs RYBMX (5%). CFWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBMX: CFWAX (1000) vs RYBMX (2500). RYBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.30 vs. CFWAX (5.44). RYBMX return over 5 years is better than : 15.65 vs. CFWAX (13.95).
| CFWAX | RYBMX | CFWAX / RYBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.64 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.69 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.308 | 5.484 | 115% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 111% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 565M | 37.8M | 1,495% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.62 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 12.30 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.47 | 15.51 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.95 | 15.65 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.04 | 85.57 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement