Ad is loading...
CFWCX vs FSDPX
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts CFWCX vs FSDPX
Calvert Global Water C
Price$24.63
Change+$0.14 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets523.92M
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$86.17
Change+$0.60 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets721.19M
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWCX vs. FSDPX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWCX is a Buy and FSDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 721M vs. CFWCX (524M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than CFWCX: FSDPX (1.05) vs CFWCX (0.85). CFWCX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: CFWCX (17 years) vs FSDPX (39 years). CFWCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.71). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. CFWCX (29.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWCX: FSDPX (0) vs CFWCX (1000). CFWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.88 vs. FSDPX (-18.08). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 87.11 vs. CFWCX (67.29).
| CFWCX | FSDPX | CFWCX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.71 | 280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.71 | 287% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.451 | 1.821 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 524M | 721M | 73% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.05 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.88 | -18.08 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.82 | -20.01 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.29 | 87.11 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.41 | 16.11 | 319% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers