Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWCX vs FSDPX
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts CFWCX vs FSDPX
Calvert Global Water C
Price$26.11
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets529.36M
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$89.11
Change-$0.04 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets719.5M
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWCX vs. FSDPX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWCX is a Buy and FSDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 720M vs. CFWCX (529M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than CFWCX: FSDPX (0.94) vs CFWCX (0.80). CFWCX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: CFWCX (17 years) vs FSDPX (39 years). CFWCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. CFWCX (29.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWCX: FSDPX (0) vs CFWCX (1000). CFWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.79 vs. FSDPX (-9.87). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 41.52 vs. CFWCX (37.78).
| CFWCX | FSDPX | CFWCX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.70 | 284% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.70 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.973 | 6.080 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 529M | 720M | 73% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.94 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.79 | -9.87 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.24 | -13.52 | -91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.78 | 41.52 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.41 | 18.46 | 338% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement