Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWCX vs FSDPX
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts CFWCX vs FSDPX
Calvert Global Water C
Price$27.03
Change-$0.24 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets559.91M
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$86.41
Change-$0.23 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets680.33M
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWCX vs. FSDPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWCX is a Hold and FSDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 680M vs. CFWCX (560M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than CFWCX: FSDPX (0.93) vs CFWCX (0.76). CFWCX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: CFWCX (17 years) vs FSDPX (39 years). CFWCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. CFWCX (29.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWCX: FSDPX (0) vs CFWCX (1000). CFWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.52 vs. FSDPX (-11.95). CFWCX return over 5 years is better than : 25.23 vs. FSDPX (16.62).
| CFWCX | FSDPX | CFWCX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.70 | 284% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.70 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.870 | 3.094 | 351% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 560M | 680M | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.93 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.52 | -11.95 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.00 | -11.05 | -172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.23 | 16.62 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.11 | 24.51 | 347% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement