Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWCX vs FSDPX
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts CFWCX vs FSDPX
Calvert Global Water C
Price$27.81
Change-$0.24 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets564.6M
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$94.37
Change-$0.81 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets743.4M
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWCX vs. FSDPX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWCX is a Buy and FSDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 743M vs. CFWCX (565M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than CFWCX: FSDPX (0.88) vs CFWCX (0.76). CFWCX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: CFWCX (17 years) vs FSDPX (39 years). CFWCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. CFWCX (29.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWCX: FSDPX (0) vs CFWCX (1000). CFWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.71 vs. FSDPX (-0.72). CFWCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.19 vs. FSDPX (37.83).
| CFWCX | FSDPX | CFWCX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.70 | 284% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.70 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.069 | 12.292 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 565M | 743M | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.88 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.71 | -0.72 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.02 | 3.60 | 751% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.19 | 37.83 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.90 | 41.05 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement