Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWCX vs FSDPX
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts CFWCX vs FSDPX
Calvert Global Water C
Price$26.99
Change-$0.15 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets546.26M
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$91.97
Change-$0.42 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets729.08M
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWCX vs. FSDPX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWCX is a StrongBuy and FSDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 729M vs. CFWCX (546M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than CFWCX: FSDPX (0.92) vs CFWCX (0.78). CFWCX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: CFWCX (17 years) vs FSDPX (39 years). CFWCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. CFWCX (29.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWCX: FSDPX (0) vs CFWCX (1000). CFWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.86 vs. FSDPX (-5.62). CFWCX (50.34) and FSDPX (48.12) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CFWCX | FSDPX | CFWCX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.70 | 284% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.70 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.321 | 9.936 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 546M | 729M | 75% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.92 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.86 | -5.62 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.65 | 9.23 | 310% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.34 | 48.12 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.99 | 24.67 | 300% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers