Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWCX vs FSDPX
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts CFWCX vs FSDPX
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWCX vs. FSDPX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWCX is a Hold and FSDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 824M vs. CFWCX (552M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than CFWCX: FSDPX (1.30) vs CFWCX (0.26). CFWCX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: CFWCX (18 years) vs FSDPX (40 years). CFWCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.69). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CFWCX (24.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWCX: FSDPX (0) vs CFWCX (1000). FSDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.93 vs. CFWCX (7.64). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 11.57 vs. CFWCX (9.63).
| CFWCX | FSDPX | CFWCX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.69 | 288% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.69 | 296% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.283 | 11.875 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 552M | 824M | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.30 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.64 | 18.93 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.15 | 13.97 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.63 | 11.57 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.18 | 55.90 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement