Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWCX vs FSDPX
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts CFWCX vs FSDPX
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWCX vs. FSDPX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWCX is a Hold and FSDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 785M vs. CFWCX (565M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than CFWCX: FSDPX (1.34) vs CFWCX (0.25). CFWCX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: CFWCX (18 years) vs FSDPX (40 years). CFWCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.69). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CFWCX (24.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWCX: FSDPX (0) vs CFWCX (1000). FSDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.69 vs. CFWCX (4.28). CFWCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.46 vs. FSDPX (7.23).
| CFWCX | FSDPX | CFWCX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.69 | 288% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.69 | 296% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.925 | 7.552 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 565M | 785M | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.34 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.28 | 8.69 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.62 | 3.69 | 342% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.46 | 7.23 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.98 | 44.00 | 180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement