CFWFF
Price
$2.58
Change
+$0.08 (+3.20%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
322.08M
NOA
Price
$16.52
Change
-$0.04 (-0.24%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
604.62M
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFWFF vs NOA

Header iconCFWFF vs NOA Comparison
Open Charts CFWFF vs NOABanner chart's image
Calfrac Well Services
Price$2.58
Change+$0.08 (+3.20%)
Volume$1.15K
Capitalization322.08M
North American Construction Group
Price$16.52
Change-$0.04 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization604.62M
CFWFF vs NOA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFWFF vs. NOA commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWFF is a StrongBuy and NOA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CFWFF: $2.50 vs. NOA: $16.55)
Brand notoriety: CFWFF and NOA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFWFF: 33% vs. NOA: 25%
Market capitalization -- CFWFF: $322.08M vs. NOA: $604.62M
CFWFF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $322.08M. NOA’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $604.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFWFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNOA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CFWFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NOA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NOA is a better buy in the long-term than CFWFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFWFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFWFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NOA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFWFF is a better buy in the short-term than NOA.

Price Growth

CFWFF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +0.44% price change this week, while NOA (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -1.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

NOA is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.62% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NOA($605M) has a higher market cap than CFWFF($322M). NOA has higher P/E ratio than CFWFF: NOA (14.57) vs CFWFF (3.98). CFWFF YTD gains are higher at: -5.371 vs. NOA (-23.415). CFWFF (264M) and NOA (253M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . NOA has more cash in the bank: 88.6M vs. CFWFF (23.2M). CFWFF has less debt than NOA: CFWFF (365M) vs NOA (717M). CFWFF has higher revenues than NOA: CFWFF (1.7B) vs NOA (957M).
CFWFFNOACFWFF / NOA
Capitalization322M605M53%
EBITDA264M253M104%
Gain YTD-5.371-23.41523%
P/E Ratio3.9814.5727%
Revenue1.7B957M177%
Total Cash23.2M88.6M26%
Total Debt365M717M51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFWFF vs NOA: Fundamental Ratings
CFWFF
NOA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8953
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10050
SMR RATING
1..100
8671
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5980
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
241
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5049

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NOA's Valuation (50) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CFWFF (53) in the null industry. This means that NOA’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

NOA's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFWFF (100) in the null industry. This means that NOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

NOA's SMR Rating (71) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CFWFF (86) in the null industry. This means that NOA’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CFWFF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (80) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CFWFF’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

CFWFF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOA (41) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CFWFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFWFFNOA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITHTX56.19N/A
N/A
Hartford Capital Appreciation R5
RYAEX119.65N/A
N/A
Rydex Europe 1.25x Strategy A
MUSBX35.42N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Core Equity B
GCLSX24.51N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
SDVRX25.67N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val R

CFWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFWFF and NOA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFWFF and NOA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFWFF
1D Price
Change %
CFWFF100%
-3.02%
NOA - CFWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
CLB - CFWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
TOLWF - CFWFF
29%
Poorly correlated
+16.59%
HAL - CFWFF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
NOV - CFWFF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
More

NOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOA has been loosely correlated with HAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOA jumps, then HAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOA
1D Price
Change %
NOA100%
-0.06%
HAL - NOA
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
VAL - NOA
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
HLX - NOA
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
SLB - NOA
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
WFRD - NOA
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.11%
More