Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWIX vs FSDPX
CFWIX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts CFWIX vs FSDPX
Calvert Global Water I
Price$31.08
Change+$0.06 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets566.45M
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$94.38
Change+$0.66 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets737.92M
CFWIX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWIX vs. FSDPX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWIX is a Buy and FSDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 738M vs. CFWIX (566M). CFWIX pays higher dividends than FSDPX: CFWIX (1.62) vs FSDPX (0.88). CFWIX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: CFWIX (12 years) vs FSDPX (39 years). CFWIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. CFWIX (29.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWIX: FSDPX (0) vs CFWIX (1000000). CFWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.68 vs. FSDPX (-5.43). CFWIX return over 5 years is better than : 45.04 vs. FSDPX (32.75).
| CFWIX | FSDPX | CFWIX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.70 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.70 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.273 | 11.518 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 566M | 738M | 77% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 0.88 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.68 | -5.43 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.43 | 11.21 | 396% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.04 | 32.75 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.81 | 36.56 | 303% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement