Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWIX vs FSDPX
CFWIX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts CFWIX vs FSDPX
CFWIX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWIX vs. FSDPX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWIX is a StrongBuy and FSDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 748M vs. CFWIX (565M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than CFWIX: FSDPX (1.38) vs CFWIX (1.14). CFWIX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: CFWIX (13 years) vs FSDPX (40 years). CFWIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.69). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CFWIX (24.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWIX: FSDPX (0) vs CFWIX (1000000). FSDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.50 vs. CFWIX (7.19). CFWIX return over 5 years is better than : 13.48 vs. FSDPX (3.09).
| CFWIX | FSDPX | CFWIX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.69 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.69 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.009 | 5.391 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 565M | 748M | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.38 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.19 | 10.50 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.39 | -1.83 | -950% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.48 | 3.09 | 436% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.31 | 43.57 | 235% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers