Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWIX vs FSDPX
CFWIX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts CFWIX vs FSDPX
CFWIX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWIX vs. FSDPX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWIX is a Hold and FSDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 785M vs. CFWIX (565M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than CFWIX: FSDPX (1.34) vs CFWIX (1.14). CFWIX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: CFWIX (12 years) vs FSDPX (40 years). CFWIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.69). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CFWIX (24.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWIX: FSDPX (0) vs CFWIX (1000000). FSDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.69 vs. CFWIX (5.72). CFWIX return over 5 years is better than : 15.51 vs. FSDPX (7.23).
| CFWIX | FSDPX | CFWIX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.69 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.69 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.465 | 7.552 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 565M | 785M | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.34 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | 8.69 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.46 | 3.69 | 473% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.51 | 7.23 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.86 | 44.00 | 225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement