Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGACX vs CSPAX
CGACX vs CSPAX Comparison
Open Charts CGACX vs CSPAX
CGACX vs CSPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGACX vs. CSPAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGACX is a Hold and CSPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. CGACX (181M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than CGACX: CSPAX (0.60) vs CGACX (0.00). CGACX was incepted earlier than CSPAX: CGACX (19 years) vs CSPAX (25 years). CGACX (2.23) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). CGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGACX: CSPAX (250) vs CGACX (1000). CGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.10 vs. CSPAX (15.10). CGACX return over 5 years is better than : 18.26 vs. CSPAX (-2.97).
| CGACX | CSPAX | CGACX / CSPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.04 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 1.04 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.568 | 14.567 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 181M | 89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.10 | 15.10 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.60 | 40.37 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.26 | -2.97 | -615% |
| Returns for 10 years | 155.00 | 82.19 | 189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement