Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGACX vs SCWFX
CGACX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts CGACX vs SCWFX
CGACX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGACX vs. SCWFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGACX is a Buy and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. CGACX (190M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than CGACX: SCWFX (0.58) vs CGACX (0.00). CGACX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: CGACX (19 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). CGACX (2.23) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). CGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGACX: SCWFX (250) vs CGACX (1000). CGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.30 vs. SCWFX (12.66). CGACX return over 5 years is better than : 14.79 vs. SCWFX (-7.17).
| CGACX | SCWFX | CGACX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.07 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 1.07 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.695 | 10.314 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 190M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.30 | 12.66 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.21 | 27.26 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.79 | -7.17 | -206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.85 | 79.75 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers