Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGACX vs SFCWX
CGACX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts CGACX vs SFCWX
CGACX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGACX vs. SFCWX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGACX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. CGACX (181M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than CGACX: SFCWX (0.92) vs CGACX (0.00). CGACX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: CGACX (19 years) vs SFCWX (10 years). CGACX (2.23) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). CGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SFCWX (41.00). CGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: CGACX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). CGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.10 vs. SFCWX (15.74). CGACX return over 5 years is better than : 18.26 vs. SFCWX (-0.82).
| CGACX | SFCWX | CGACX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.65 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 0.65 | 343% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.568 | 14.869 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 181M | 89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.92 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.10 | 15.74 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.60 | 42.31 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.26 | -0.82 | -2,223% |
| Returns for 10 years | 155.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers