Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGAEX vs RSLFX
CGAEX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts CGAEX vs RSLFX
CGAEX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGAEX vs. RSLFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGAEX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. CGAEX (182M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than CGAEX: RSLFX (0.81) vs CGAEX (0.46). CGAEX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: CGAEX (19 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). CGAEX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). CGAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RSLFX (41.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGAEX: RSLFX (250) vs CGAEX (1000). CGAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.01 vs. RSLFX (9.55). CGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 17.17 vs. RSLFX (-7.47).
| CGAEX | RSLFX | CGAEX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.70 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.70 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.036 | 12.524 | 80% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 182M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.81 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.01 | 9.55 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.34 | 39.09 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.17 | -7.47 | -230% |
| Returns for 10 years | 168.62 | 90.43 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement