Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGAFX vs VBMFX
CGAFX vs VBMFX Comparison
Open Charts CGAFX vs VBMFX
CGAFX vs VBMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGAFX vs. VBMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGAFX is a Hold and VBMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VBMFX has more cash in the bank: 390B vs. CGAFX (824M). VBMFX pays higher dividends than CGAFX: VBMFX (3.86) vs CGAFX (3.51). CGAFX was incepted earlier than VBMFX: CGAFX (13 years) vs VBMFX (40 years). CGAFX (0.78) is less costly to investors than VBMFX (0.15). VBMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. CGAFX (22.00). CGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VBMFX: CGAFX (1000) vs VBMFX (3000). CGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. VBMFX (1.26). CGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.45 vs. VBMFX (-14.11).
| CGAFX | VBMFX | CGAFX / VBMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.15 | 487% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.15 | 520% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.298 | -1.228 | -24% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 824M | 390B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 3.86 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | 1.26 | 394% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.63 | 0.73 | 1,865% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.45 | -14.11 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.34 | -10.99 | -140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers