CGBD
Price
$13.79
Change
-$0.02 (-0.14%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
66 days until earnings call
MAIN
Price
$66.52
Change
-$0.07 (-0.11%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.95B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGBD vs MAIN

Header iconCGBD vs MAIN Comparison
Open Charts CGBD vs MAINBanner chart's image
Carlyle Secured Lending
Price$13.79
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
Volume$279.9K
Capitalization1.01B
Main Street Capital
Price$66.52
Change-$0.07 (-0.11%)
Volume$539.98K
Capitalization5.95B
CGBD vs MAIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGBD vs. MAIN commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBD is a StrongBuy and MAIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CGBD: $13.79 vs. MAIN: $66.52)
Brand notoriety: CGBD and MAIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGBD: 66% vs. MAIN: 109%
Market capitalization -- CGBD: $1.01B vs. MAIN: $5.95B
CGBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.01B. MAIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGBD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMAIN’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • CGBD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MAIN’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than CGBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGBD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAIN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGBD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MAIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CGBD and MAIN are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CGBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.43% price change this week, while MAIN (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGBD is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

MAIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($5.95B) has a higher market cap than CGBD($1.01B). CGBD has higher P/E ratio than MAIN: CGBD (11.80) vs MAIN (10.94). MAIN YTD gains are higher at: 18.829 vs. CGBD (-18.678). CGBD has less debt than MAIN: CGBD (1.31B) vs MAIN (2.22B). MAIN has higher revenues than CGBD: MAIN (623M) vs CGBD (79.8M).
CGBDMAINCGBD / MAIN
Capitalization1.01B5.95B17%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-18.67818.829-99%
P/E Ratio11.8010.94108%
Revenue79.8M623M13%
Total Cash22.7MN/A-
Total Debt1.31B2.22B59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGBD vs MAIN: Fundamental Ratings
CGBD
MAIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6280
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
227
SMR RATING
1..100
4316
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2231
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5555

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGBD's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (14). This means that CGBD’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as CGBD (22). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to CGBD’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as CGBD (43). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to CGBD’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CGBD (61). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to CGBD’s over the last 12 months.

CGBD's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (31). This means that CGBD’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGBDMAIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NLSCX18.74N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
ICHKX15.31N/A
N/A
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
PXSGX29.45N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth I
AGGIX12.67N/A
N/A
American Century Focused Global Gr I
RIVBX37.54N/A
N/A
Riverbridge Growth Institutional

CGBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBD has been closely correlated with GSBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBD jumps, then GSBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGBD
1D Price
Change %
CGBD100%
-0.14%
GSBD - CGBD
75%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
BCSF - CGBD
73%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
GLAD - CGBD
70%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
MAIN - CGBD
69%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
OBDC - CGBD
68%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
More