CGBD
Price
$16.35
Change
-$0.18 (-1.09%)
Updated
Nov 14, 03:17 PM (EDT)
110 days until earnings call
MAIN
Price
$51.94
Change
-$0.29 (-0.56%)
Updated
Nov 14, 03:29 PM (EDT)
98 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CGBD vs MAIN

Header iconCGBD vs MAIN Comparison
Open Charts CGBD vs MAINBanner chart's image
Carlyle Secured Lending
Price$16.35
Change-$0.18 (-1.09%)
Volume$288
CapitalizationN/A
Main Street Capital
Price$51.94
Change-$0.29 (-0.56%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
CGBD vs MAIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGBD vs. MAIN commentary
Nov 14, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBD is a StrongSell and MAIN is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2024
Stock price -- (CGBD: $16.53 vs. MAIN: $52.23)
Brand notoriety: CGBD and MAIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGBD: 73% vs. MAIN: 152%
Market capitalization -- CGBD: $826.94M vs. MAIN: $4.02B
CGBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $826.94M. MAIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGBD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMAIN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CGBD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MAIN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than CGBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGBD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAIN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGBD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MAIN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the short-term than CGBD.

Price Growth

CGBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.73% price change this week, while MAIN (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGBD is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

MAIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.24% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($4.02B) has a higher market cap than CGBD($827M). CGBD has higher P/E ratio than MAIN: CGBD (9.82) vs MAIN (8.97). MAIN YTD gains are higher at: 30.052 vs. CGBD (20.069). CGBD has less debt than MAIN: CGBD (979M) vs MAIN (1.8B). MAIN has higher revenues than CGBD: MAIN (510M) vs CGBD (101M).
CGBDMAINCGBD / MAIN
Capitalization827M4.02B21%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.06930.05267%
P/E Ratio9.828.97109%
Revenue101M510M20%
Total Cash22.7MN/A-
Total Debt979M1.8B54%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGBD vs MAIN: Fundamental Ratings
CGBD
MAIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7013
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1828
SMR RATING
1..100
2413
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8047
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGBD's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (29). This means that CGBD’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

CGBD's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (28). This means that CGBD’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as CGBD (24). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to CGBD’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CGBD (54). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to CGBD’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGBD (80). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGBD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGBDMAIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 30 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HGIIX58.300.02
+0.03%
Hartford Core Equity I
SILVX22.50N/A
N/A
SGI US Large Cap Equity I
TGRYX12.44-0.01
-0.08%
TCW Global Real Estate N
HFYCX10.09-0.06
-0.59%
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val C
PIIFX26.19-0.25
-0.95%
Pioneer International Equity A

CGBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBD has been loosely correlated with SLRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGBD jumps, then SLRC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGBD
1D Price
Change %
CGBD100%
+0.98%
SLRC - CGBD
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
GSBD - CGBD
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
BCSF - CGBD
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
CSWC - CGBD
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
MAIN - CGBD
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More

MAIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAIN has been closely correlated with HTGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAIN jumps, then HTGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAIN
1D Price
Change %
MAIN100%
-0.08%
HTGC - MAIN
69%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
CSWC - MAIN
67%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
ARCC - MAIN
66%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
MFIC - MAIN
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
FSK - MAIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
More