CGBD
Price
$10.71
Change
-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:04 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
745.36M
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NCDL
Price
$12.19
Change
+$0.11 (+0.91%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
596.6M
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGBD vs NCDL

CGBD vs NCDL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGBD vs. NCDL commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBD is a StrongBuy and NCDL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CGBD: $10.73 vs. NCDL: $12.08)
Brand notoriety: CGBD and NCDL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGBD: 107% vs. NCDL: 225%
Market capitalization -- CGBD: $745.36M vs. NCDL: $596.6M
CGBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $745.36M. NCDL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $596.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $163.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGBD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNCDL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGBD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NCDL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGBD is a better buy in the long-term than NCDL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGBD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NCDL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NCDL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGBD is a better buy in the short-term than NCDL.

Price Growth

CGBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.14% price change this week, while NCDL (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGBD is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

NCDL is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.14% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBD($745M) has a higher market cap than NCDL($597M). CGBD has higher P/E ratio than NCDL: CGBD (15.32) vs NCDL (10.15). NCDL YTD gains are higher at: -6.548 vs. CGBD (-10.977). CGBD has more cash in the bank: 22.7M vs. NCDL (8.55M). NCDL has less debt than CGBD: NCDL (1.14B) vs CGBD (1.39B). NCDL has higher revenues than CGBD: NCDL (72.6M) vs CGBD (63.1M).
CGBDNCDLCGBD / NCDL
Capitalization745M597M125%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.977-6.548168%
P/E Ratio15.3210.15151%
Revenue63.1M72.6M87%
Total Cash22.7M8.55M265%
Total Debt1.39B1.14B122%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGBD: Fundamental Ratings
CGBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGBDNCDL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NCDL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JUSRX28.47N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Equity R5
GSMCX40.60N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Instl
LSRCX1.08N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C
HFMVX32.31N/A
N/A
Hartford MidCap R6
SQCBX15.44N/A
N/A
X-Square Balanced Fund, LLC C

CGBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBD has been closely correlated with BXSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBD jumps, then BXSL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGBD
1D Price
Change %
CGBD100%
-2.05%
BXSL - CGBD
73%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
NCDL - CGBD
71%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
MSDL - CGBD
71%
Closely correlated
-2.67%
GSBD - CGBD
70%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
ARCC - CGBD
69%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
More

NCDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NCDL has been closely correlated with BXSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NCDL jumps, then BXSL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCDL
1D Price
Change %
NCDL100%
-1.23%
BXSL - NCDL
73%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
KBDC - NCDL
72%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
GSBD - NCDL
72%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
CGBD - NCDL
71%
Closely correlated
-2.05%
OBDC - NCDL
70%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
More