CGBD
Price
$14.77
Change
-$1.20 (-7.51%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
826.94M
37 days until earnings call
TRIN
Price
$14.30
Change
-$1.22 (-7.86%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
672.87M
31 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CGBD vs TRIN

Header iconCGBD vs TRIN Comparison
Open Charts CGBD vs TRINBanner chart's image
Carlyle Secured Lending
Price$14.77
Change-$1.20 (-7.51%)
Volume$760.59K
Capitalization826.94M
Trinity Capital
Price$14.30
Change-$1.22 (-7.86%)
Volume$1.23M
Capitalization672.87M
CGBD vs TRIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGBD vs. TRIN commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBD is a StrongBuy and TRIN is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CGBD: $14.77 vs. TRIN: $14.30)
Brand notoriety: CGBD and TRIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGBD: 317% vs. TRIN: 214%
Market capitalization -- CGBD: $826.94M vs. TRIN: $672.87M
CGBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $826.94M. TRIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $672.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGBD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTRIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGBD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TRIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGBD is a better buy in the long-term than TRIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGBD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRIN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGBD is a better buy in the short-term than TRIN.

Price Growth

CGBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а -11.66% price change this week, while TRIN (@Investment Managers) price change was -6.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -5.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGBD is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

TRIN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-5.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBD($827M) has a higher market cap than TRIN($673M). CGBD has higher P/E ratio than TRIN: CGBD (9.82) vs TRIN (7.67). TRIN YTD gains are higher at: 2.115 vs. CGBD (-15.402). CGBD has more cash in the bank: 22.7M vs. TRIN (707K). TRIN has less debt than CGBD: TRIN (640M) vs CGBD (979M). TRIN has higher revenues than CGBD: TRIN (125M) vs CGBD (101M).
CGBDTRINCGBD / TRIN
Capitalization827M673M123%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-15.4022.115-728%
P/E Ratio9.827.67128%
Revenue101M125M81%
Total Cash22.7M707K3,211%
Total Debt979M640M153%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGBD: Fundamental Ratings
CGBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGBDTRIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SECAX9.21-0.44
-4.54%
SEI Small Cap II A (SIIT)
MRNPX27.14-1.64
-5.70%
Morgan Stanley Inst International Opp IR
RLUEX3.19-0.20
-5.90%
Lazard US Equity Concentrated R6
SIDNX10.14-0.67
-6.20%
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val I
MLACX3.53-0.25
-6.61%
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Class C

CGBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBD has been loosely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGBD jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGBD
1D Price
Change %
CGBD100%
-7.51%
MAIN - CGBD
66%
Loosely correlated
-7.96%
GLAD - CGBD
64%
Loosely correlated
-9.02%
FSK - CGBD
61%
Loosely correlated
-6.37%
CSWC - CGBD
61%
Loosely correlated
-9.14%
TSLX - CGBD
60%
Loosely correlated
-6.91%
More

TRIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRIN has been loosely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRIN jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRIN
1D Price
Change %
TRIN100%
-7.38%
MAIN - TRIN
61%
Loosely correlated
-7.96%
TSLX - TRIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-6.91%
PNNT - TRIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-8.26%
FSK - TRIN
59%
Loosely correlated
-6.37%
PFLT - TRIN
57%
Loosely correlated
-9.13%
More