CGBD
Price
$13.88
Change
+$0.06 (+0.43%)
Updated
Aug 12, 04:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.01B
91 days until earnings call
TRIN
Price
$15.86
Change
+$0.11 (+0.70%)
Updated
Aug 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.11B
85 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGBD vs TRIN

Header iconCGBD vs TRIN Comparison
Open Charts CGBD vs TRINBanner chart's image
Carlyle Secured Lending
Price$13.88
Change+$0.06 (+0.43%)
Volume$400
Capitalization1.01B
Trinity Capital
Price$15.86
Change+$0.11 (+0.70%)
Volume$6.23K
Capitalization1.11B
CGBD vs TRIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGBD vs. TRIN commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBD is a StrongBuy and TRIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CGBD: $13.82 vs. TRIN: $15.76)
Brand notoriety: CGBD and TRIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGBD: 77% vs. TRIN: 104%
Market capitalization -- CGBD: $1.01B vs. TRIN: $1.11B
CGBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.01B. TRIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $174.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGBD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTRIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CGBD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TRIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGBD is a better buy in the long-term than TRIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGBD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRIN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGBD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TRIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRIN is a better buy in the short-term than CGBD.

Price Growth

CGBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.80% price change this week, while TRIN (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +3.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGBD is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

TRIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+3.94% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIN($1.11B) has a higher market cap than CGBD($1.01B). CGBD has higher P/E ratio than TRIN: CGBD (11.81) vs TRIN (6.94). TRIN YTD gains are higher at: 16.691 vs. CGBD (-18.501). CGBD has more cash in the bank: 22.7M vs. TRIN (5.12M). TRIN has less debt than CGBD: TRIN (959M) vs CGBD (1.25B). TRIN has higher revenues than CGBD: TRIN (190M) vs CGBD (83.7M).
CGBDTRINCGBD / TRIN
Capitalization1.01B1.11B91%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-18.50116.691-111%
P/E Ratio11.816.94170%
Revenue83.7M190M44%
Total Cash22.7M5.12M443%
Total Debt1.25B959M130%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGBD: Fundamental Ratings
CGBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
81
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18
SMR RATING
1..100
45
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGBDTRIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
41%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBISX11.05N/A
N/A
DWS Global Macro A
PNORX117.47N/A
N/A
Putnam Sustainable Leaders R
NWKCX81.00N/A
N/A
Nationwide Geneva Small Cap Gr R6
FAPHX13.18N/A
N/A
Fidelity Healthy Future
REFGX8.01-0.01
-0.12%
Emerging Markets Equities Fund R-6

CGBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBD has been closely correlated with BCSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBD jumps, then BCSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGBD
1D Price
Change %
CGBD100%
-0.79%
BCSF - CGBD
72%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
GSBD - CGBD
72%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
GLAD - CGBD
72%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
MAIN - CGBD
70%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
TRIN - CGBD
67%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
More

TRIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRIN has been closely correlated with GSBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRIN jumps, then GSBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRIN
1D Price
Change %
TRIN100%
-0.38%
GSBD - TRIN
70%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
CGBD - TRIN
67%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
MAIN - TRIN
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
BCSF - TRIN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
PNNT - TRIN
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
More