Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs RAA
CGBL vs RAA Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs RAA
CGBL vs RAA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. RAA commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and RAA is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 7.63B vs. RAA (619M). RAA has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: RAA (11.577) vs CGBL (9.057). CGBL was incepted earlier than RAA: CGBL (3 years) vs RAA (1 year). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than RAA (0.90). RAA has a higher turnover CGBL (19.00) vs CGBL (19.00).
| CGBL | RAA | CGBL / RAA | |
| Gain YTD | 9.057 | 11.577 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 7.63B | 619M | 1,232% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.90 | 37% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 162.07 | 12% |
| Yield | 1.88 | 2.13 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | RAA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 54% | 26 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| TSM - CGBL | 73% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| CAT - CGBL | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| TEL - CGBL | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| ATI - CGBL | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| AIR - CGBL | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
More | ||||
RAA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RAA has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RAA jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RAA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAA | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| LRCX - RAA | 67% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| ASML - RAA | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| KLAC - RAA | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| AMAT - RAA | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| AMD - RAA | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||