Ad is loading...
CGBL vs UPAR
CGBL vs UPAR Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs UPAR
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$31.17
Change+$0.09 (+0.29%)
Volume$1.75K
Net Assets1.85B
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
Price$13.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$36.82K
Net Assets64.93M
CGBL vs UPAR Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. UPAR commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Hold and UPAR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 1.85B vs. UPAR (64.9M). UPAR has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: UPAR (8.094) vs CGBL (-0.211). CGBL was incepted earlier than UPAR: CGBL (2 years) vs UPAR (3 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than UPAR (0.65). UPAR has a higher turnover CGBL (3.00) vs CGBL (3.00).
| CGBL | UPAR | CGBL / UPAR | |
| Gain YTD | -0.211 | 8.094 | -3% |
| Net Assets | 1.85B | 64.9M | 2,849% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.65 | 51% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 36.00 | 8% |
| Yield | 2.00 | 3.42 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | UPAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 15 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 15 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 15 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 15 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 15 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 15 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 51% | 22 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 15 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 15 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| AVGO - CGBL | 70% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 70% Closely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| AMAT - CGBL | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| TSM - CGBL | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
More | ||||
UPAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPAR has been loosely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UPAR jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPAR | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| WDS - UPAR | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| WTRG - UPAR | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
| MP - UPAR | 29% Poorly correlated | +3.11% | ||
| SHEL - UPAR | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| SMG - UPAR | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
More | ||||