Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs UPAR
CGBL vs UPAR Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs UPAR
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$34.84
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
Volume$942
Net Assets3.37B
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
Price$15.17
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
Volume$100
Net Assets60.77M
CGBL vs UPAR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. UPAR commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and UPAR is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.37B vs. UPAR (60.8M). UPAR has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: UPAR (20.188) vs CGBL (12.544). CGBL was incepted earlier than UPAR: CGBL (2 years) vs UPAR (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than UPAR (0.65). CGBL has a higher turnover UPAR (12.00) vs UPAR (12.00).
| CGBL | UPAR | CGBL / UPAR | |
| Gain YTD | 12.544 | 20.188 | 62% |
| Net Assets | 3.37B | 60.8M | 5,549% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.65 | 51% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 12.00 | 200% |
| Yield | 1.89 | 3.61 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | UPAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 54% | 16 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PYPY | 10.94 | 0.01 | +0.09% |
| YieldMax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| BSCV | 16.82 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corp Bd ETF | |||
| QWLD | 139.28 | -0.11 | -0.08% |
| SPDR® MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF | |||
| PJP | 90.83 | -0.08 | -0.09% |
| Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF | |||
| TOGA | 36.17 | -0.08 | -0.21% |
| Tremblant Global ETF | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
More | ||||
UPAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UPAR and WTRG have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UPAR and WTRG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPAR | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| WTRG - UPAR | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.32% | ||
| MP - UPAR | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
| SMG - UPAR | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
| AAL - UPAR | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
| WMS - UPAR | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.27% | ||
More | ||||