Ad is loading...
CGBL vs UPAR
CGBL vs UPAR Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs UPAR
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$32.12
Change-$0.33 (-1.02%)
Volume$460.97K
Net Assets1.75B
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
Price$13.76
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
Volume$5.8K
Net Assets63.63M
CGBL vs UPAR Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. UPAR commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Hold and UPAR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 1.75B vs. UPAR (63.6M). UPAR has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: UPAR (6.419) vs CGBL (2.718). CGBL was incepted earlier than UPAR: CGBL (1 year) vs UPAR (3 years). UPAR has a higher turnover CGBL (3.00) vs CGBL (3.00).
| CGBL | UPAR | CGBL / UPAR | |
| Gain YTD | 2.718 | 6.419 | 42% |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 63.6M | 2,756% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 36.00 | 8% |
| Yield | N/A | 2.94 | - |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | UPAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 6 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 6 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 5 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -1.02% | ||
| AVGO - CGBL | 71% Closely correlated | -3.56% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| AMAT - CGBL | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| TSM - CGBL | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.98% | ||
More | ||||
UPAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPAR has been loosely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UPAR jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPAR | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| WDS - UPAR | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.05% | ||
| WTRG - UPAR | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.64% | ||
| MP - UPAR | 29% Poorly correlated | +4.83% | ||
| SMG - UPAR | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.88% | ||
| SHEL - UPAR | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.46% | ||
More | ||||