Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs UPAR
CGBL vs UPAR Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs UPAR
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$35.16
Change+$0.12 (+0.34%)
Volume$1.15K
Net Assets4.08B
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
Price$15.39
Change-$0.06 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.98M
CGBL vs UPAR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. UPAR commentary
Dec 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and UPAR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 4.08B vs. UPAR (64M). UPAR has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: UPAR (23.433) vs CGBL (13.697). CGBL was incepted earlier than UPAR: CGBL (2 years) vs UPAR (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than UPAR (0.65). CGBL has a higher turnover UPAR (12.00) vs UPAR (12.00).
| CGBL | UPAR | CGBL / UPAR | |
| Gain YTD | 13.697 | 23.433 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 4.08B | 64M | 6,380% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.65 | 51% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 12.00 | 200% |
| Yield | 1.93 | 3.75 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | UPAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 51% | 15 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.68% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||
UPAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UPAR and WTRG have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UPAR and WTRG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPAR | 100% | -1.07% | ||
| WTRG - UPAR | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
| MP - UPAR | 29% Poorly correlated | -6.21% | ||
| SMG - UPAR | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
| AAL - UPAR | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
| WMS - UPAR | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.34% | ||
More | ||||