Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FCHKX
CGCYX vs FCHKX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FCHKX
CGCYX vs FCHKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FCHKX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FCHKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.78B vs. CGCYX (40.7M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: CGCYX (2.29) vs FCHKX (0.64). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FCHKX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FCHKX (18 years). FCHKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.34). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FCHKX (34.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FCHKX (250) vs CGCYX (1000000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.96 vs. CGCYX (-8.64). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 29.58 vs. CGCYX (-40.37).
| CGCYX | FCHKX | CGCYX / FCHKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.92 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.92 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.070 | 28.379 | -43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.7M | 2.78B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 0.64 | 357% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.64 | 49.96 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.32 | 110.46 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.37 | 29.58 | -136% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 180.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers