Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FCHKX
CGCYX vs FCHKX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FCHKX
CGCYX vs FCHKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FCHKX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FCHKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. CGCYX (44.8M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: CGCYX (2.12) vs FCHKX (0.65). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FCHKX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FCHKX (18 years). FCHKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.34). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FCHKX (34.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FCHKX (250) vs CGCYX (1000000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 80.92 vs. CGCYX (8.77). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 28.71 vs. CGCYX (-42.02).
| CGCYX | FCHKX | CGCYX / FCHKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.92 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.92 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.867 | 35.762 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.8M | 2.72B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 0.65 | 325% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.77 | 80.92 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.41 | 128.07 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.02 | 28.71 | -146% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 216.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement