Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FCHKX
CGCYX vs FCHKX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FCHKX
CGCYX vs FCHKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FCHKX commentary
Jun 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FCHKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. CGCYX (40.2M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: CGCYX (2.12) vs FCHKX (0.65). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FCHKX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FCHKX (18 years). FCHKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.34). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FCHKX (34.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FCHKX (250) vs CGCYX (1000000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 60.55 vs. CGCYX (-6.05). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 22.50 vs. CGCYX (-48.66).
| CGCYX | FCHKX | CGCYX / FCHKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.92 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.92 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.623 | 30.078 | -49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.2M | 2.72B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 0.65 | 325% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.05 | 60.55 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.32 | 119.08 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -48.66 | 22.50 | -216% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 199.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement