Ad is loading...
CGCYX vs FHKAX
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKAX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$39.81
Change+$0.32 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.85M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$37.86
Change+$0.86 (+2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Buy and FHKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. CGCYX (44.9M). CGCYX (1.19) and FHKAX (1.17) have matching dividends . CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: CGCYX (8 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). CGCYX (1.24) and FHKAX (1.18) have similar cost to investors . CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKAX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.29 vs. FHKAX (12.61). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.01 vs. CGCYX (-25.96).
| CGCYX | FHKAX | CGCYX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.18 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.18 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.064 | -3.545 | -143% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.9M | 1.18B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.17 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.29 | 12.61 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.19 | 15.51 | -33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.96 | 2.01 | -1,293% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...