Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKAX
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKAX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$45.96
Change+$0.26 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.78M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$48.01
Change+$0.07 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKAX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and FHKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. CGCYX (50.8M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: CGCYX (1.13) vs FHKAX (1.02). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). CGCYX (1.24) and FHKAX (1.18) have similar cost to investors . CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKAX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.28 vs. FHKAX (35.51). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.29 vs. CGCYX (-38.47).
| CGCYX | FHKAX | CGCYX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.18 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.18 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.748 | 24.974 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.8M | 1.31B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.02 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.28 | 35.51 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.15 | 49.84 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.47 | -1.29 | 2,977% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement