Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKAX
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKAX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$42.56
Change-$0.13 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.97M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$44.28
Change+$0.10 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKAX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FHKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. CGCYX (47M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: CGCYX (1.16) vs FHKAX (1.07). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: CGCYX (8 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). CGCYX (1.24) and FHKAX (1.18) have similar cost to investors . CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKAX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.86 vs. FHKAX (19.20). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.92 vs. CGCYX (-31.94).
| CGCYX | FHKAX | CGCYX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.18 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.18 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.245 | 15.433 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47M | 1.24B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.86 | 19.20 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.62 | 30.14 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.94 | 1.92 | -1,665% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement