Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKAX
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKAX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$50.75
Change-$0.59 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.43M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$52.75
Change+$0.39 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKAX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and FHKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. CGCYX (54.4M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: CGCYX (1.06) vs FHKAX (0.97). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). CGCYX (1.24) and FHKAX (1.18) have similar cost to investors . CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKAX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 59.54 vs. FHKAX (50.11). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.59 vs. CGCYX (-28.13).
| CGCYX | FHKAX | CGCYX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.18 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.18 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.020 | 37.513 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.4M | 1.39B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.97 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 59.54 | 50.11 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.16 | 76.17 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.13 | 10.59 | -266% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement