Ad is loading...
CGCYX vs FHKAX
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKAX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$38.58
Change+$0.81 (+2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.69M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$39.65
Change+$0.91 (+2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKAX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and FHKAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. CGCYX (43.7M). FHKAX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: FHKAX (1.51) vs CGCYX (0.82). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: CGCYX (8 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FHKAX (24.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKAX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX (31.59) and FHKAX (31.29) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.32 vs. CGCYX (-25.04).
| CGCYX | FHKAX | CGCYX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.468 | 0.991 | 451% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 1.11B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.51 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.59 | 31.29 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.58 | -5.24 | 565% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.04 | 7.32 | -342% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 31.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers