Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKAX
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKAX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$42.60
Change-$0.19 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.06M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$41.74
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKAX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FHKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. CGCYX (48.1M). CGCYX (1.25) and FHKAX (1.22) have matching dividends . CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: CGCYX (8 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). CGCYX (1.24) and FHKAX (1.18) have similar cost to investors . CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKAX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.99 vs. FHKAX (14.28). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.65 vs. CGCYX (-19.45).
| CGCYX | FHKAX | CGCYX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.18 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.18 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.868 | 8.837 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.1M | 1.1B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.22 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.99 | 14.28 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.69 | 30.69 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.45 | 13.65 | -142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement