Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKAX
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKAX
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FHKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. CGCYX (44.8M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: CGCYX (2.12) vs FHKAX (1.18). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FHKAX (18 years). CGCYX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKAX (250) vs CGCYX (1000000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 82.27 vs. CGCYX (8.77). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.15 vs. CGCYX (-42.02).
| CGCYX | FHKAX | CGCYX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.17 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.17 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.867 | 36.177 | -13% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.8M | 2.72B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 1.18 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.77 | 82.27 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.41 | 133.19 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.02 | 34.15 | -123% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 236.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement