Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKAX
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKAX
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKAX commentary
Jun 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FHKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. CGCYX (40.2M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: CGCYX (2.12) vs FHKAX (1.18). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FHKAX (18 years). CGCYX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKAX (250) vs CGCYX (1000000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.72 vs. CGCYX (-6.05). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.69 vs. CGCYX (-48.66).
| CGCYX | FHKAX | CGCYX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.17 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.17 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.623 | 30.551 | -48% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.2M | 2.72B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 1.18 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.05 | 61.72 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.32 | 123.96 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -48.66 | 27.69 | -176% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 217.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement