CGDV
Price
$45.93
Change
-$0.05 (-0.11%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Net Assets
32.05B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DIA
Price
$496.64
Change
+$2.31 (+0.47%)
Updated
Apr 21, 10:33 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
44.16B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGDV vs DIA

Header iconCGDV vs DIA Comparison
Open Charts CGDV vs DIABanner chart's image
CGDV vs DIA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) vs. State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA)

Key Takeaways

  • CGDV is actively managed focusing on dividend-paying large-cap U.S. stocks for income exceeding S&P 500 average yield, while DIA passively tracks the price-weighted Dow Jones Industrial Average of 30 blue-chip stocks.
  • CGDV offers broader diversification with ~53 holdings and top sectors including technology (26.5%) and industrials (15.4%); DIA concentrates in 30 holdings with financials (26.15%) leading.
  • Expense ratio favors DIA at 0.16% versus CGDV's 0.33%, providing cost efficiency for passive large-cap exposure.
  • CGDV's active strategy allows flexible sector tilts toward high-quality dividend growers; DIA's structure as a unit investment trust emphasizes liquidity and precise index replication.
  • Both exhibit lower volatility than broader market indices, with CGDV showing relative strength in recent market cycles due to tech and healthcare allocations.
  • DIA provides concentrated blue-chip exposure ideal for Dow-focused investors; CGDV suits those seeking enhanced income with growth potential through active management.

Introduction

In the current market environment favoring resilient large-cap equities amid interest rate uncertainty and sector rotation, comparing CGDV and DIA highlights distinct paths to U.S. equity exposure. CGDV, an active dividend value strategy, targets income and principal growth from high-quality payers, blending value discipline with selective growth traits. DIA, a passive benchmark tracker, delivers the iconic Dow Jones Industrial Average's blue-chip composition. While not direct competitors, both appeal to investors seeking stability over speculative growth, offering alternatives in large-cap value with differing diversification, costs, and management styles. This ETF comparison examines their structural differences, sector profiles, and positioning for enduring portfolios.

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) Overview

The Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is an actively managed fund seeking income exceeding the average yield on U.S. stocks and opportunities for principal growth. It primarily invests at least 80% of assets in dividend-paying common stocks of large established U.S. companies (market caps over $4 billion), with up to 10% in non-U.S. large-caps. Employing Capital Group's multi-manager system, it leverages collaborative research for bottom-up stock selection without rigid index constraints.

Key structural features include approximately 53 holdings, an expense ratio of 0.33%, and moderate turnover around 29%. Top holdings (as of late February 2026) feature MSFT (5.3%), NVDA (5.0%), RTX (4.3%), AVGO (4.2%), and AMAT (4.2%). Sector allocations emphasize information technology (26.5%), industrials (15.4%), health care (13.1%), consumer discretionary (8.9%), and energy (6.3%). Distinguishing traits include its focus on sustainable dividends from quality firms and tax-efficient ETF structure.

State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) Overview

The State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) is a passive unit investment trust tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average, a price-weighted index of 30 prominent U.S. blue-chip companies selected for sustained earnings performance. It holds substantially all DJIA components in index proportions, delivering broad large-cap exposure with industrial and financial tilts.

Structural highlights encompass exactly 30 holdings, a low expense ratio of 0.16%, and high liquidity evidenced by tight bid-ask spreads. Top holdings (as of mid-March 2026) include GS (10.40%), CAT (9.16%), MSFT (5.23%), AMGN (4.79%), and HD (4.48%). Sector breakdown features financials (26.15%), information technology (17.87%), industrials (17.02%), health care (13.25%), and consumer discretionary (12.27%). As a UIT, it prioritizes precise replication and monthly distributions, with robust trading volume supporting institutional accessibility.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The large-cap value and dividend stock universe thrives amid macroeconomic shifts like stabilizing interest rates and sector rotation from high-growth tech to cyclicals. Financials and industrials, prominent in both ETFs, benefit from economic resilience, infrastructure spending, and corporate earnings recovery. Dividend payers offer defensive income streams, attracting capital flows in volatile cycles as investors prioritize quality balance sheets over speculation.

Regulatory tailwinds in energy and materials support CGDV's tilts, while DIA's blue-chips navigate geopolitical tensions via diversified industrials exposure. Broader risks include inflation persistence impacting rate-sensitive financials and supply chain disruptions in industrials. Recent capital inflows to value-oriented strategies underscore demand for ETFs blending income stability with moderate growth prospects in this environment.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, CGDV has demonstrated outperformance relative to broad indices like the S&P 500, with annualized returns around 25% over three years and lower volatility (standard deviation ~11-18%) driven by active selection of dividend growers in technology and healthcare. DIA mirrors DJIA dynamics, offering steady positioning with beta near 0.89, benefiting from financials and industrials momentum during rotations.

CGDV's broader holdings provide smoother relative strength in growth-favoring periods, while DIA's concentration amplifies blue-chip earnings cycles. Volatility profiles favor both over growth peers, with CGDV's flexibility aiding downside capture below market norms. Positioning ties to macro shifts: rate expectations boost financials in DIA, while sector momentum in industrials supports both amid commodity stability.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across strategies like trend-following, mean reversion, and momentum, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns. Only the strongest, real-time performers rise to this curated section, varying by timeframe from intraday to long-term and covering equities, ETFs, forex, and crypto. Factual ranges highlight top bots achieving 70-90% win rates or 2-5x profit factors in backtests and live trading. Investors can explore, backtest, and deploy these bots for automated signals, enhancing decision-making without emotional bias. Visit the page to discover leading performers tailored to current volatility and trends.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors CGDV with moderate probability due to its structural advantages in diversification (~53 holdings vs. 30), active management enabling quality dividend selection, and consistent trend strength from tech-healthcare tilts amid sector rotation. While DIA excels in cost efficiency (0.16% expense) and liquidity, CGDV's lower downside volatility and income focus align better with risk-adjusted returns in uncertain cycles. This assessment weighs observable factors like exposure profiles and relative positioning, not as advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CGDV vs. DIA commentary
Apr 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGDV is a Buy and DIA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIA has more net assets: 44.2B vs. CGDV (32B). CGDV has a higher annual dividend yield than DIA: CGDV (5.528) vs DIA (3.295). CGDV was incepted earlier than DIA: CGDV (4 years) vs DIA (28 years). DIA (0.16) has a lower expense ratio than CGDV (0.33). CGDV has a higher turnover DIA (8.00) vs DIA (8.00).
CGDVDIACGDV / DIA
Gain YTD5.5283.295168%
Net Assets32B44.2B72%
Total Expense Ratio0.330.16206%
Turnover29.008.00363%
Yield1.341.5288%
Fund Existence4 years28 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGDVDIA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGDV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DIA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KBUF28.86N/A
N/A
KraneShares 90% KWEB Dfnd Outcm Jan27ETF
YALL44.77-0.01
-0.03%
God Bless America ETF
QCAP24.07-0.04
-0.17%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Apr
LVHI40.79-0.10
-0.24%
Franklin Intl Low Volatility Hi Div ETF
BRRR21.54-0.33
-1.51%
CoinShares Bitcoin ETF

CGDV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGDV has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGDV jumps, then META could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGDV
1D Price
Change %
CGDV100%
-0.11%
META - CGDV
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.56%
SWK - CGDV
63%
Loosely correlated
+5.30%
NVDA - CGDV
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
MU - CGDV
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
JPM - CGDV
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
More