CGDV and SCHD represent compelling options in the dividend ETF space, appealing to income-seeking investors amid shifting sector rotations and interest rate dynamics. While both prioritize U.S. large-cap dividend payers exceeding S&P 500 yields, they diverge structurally: CGDV's active management enables nimble exposure to growth-tilted names, contrasting SCHD's passive replication of a quality-focused index. This ETF comparison highlights their roles as alternatives for balancing income, growth, and risk in portfolios navigating economic uncertainty, inflation pressures, and potential rate cuts. Investors weigh CGDV's outperformance potential against SCHD's cost and stability advantages.
The Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV), launched in February 2022, is an actively managed fund seeking income exceeding the S&P 500 average yield alongside principal growth. It invests at least 80% in dividend-paying common stocks of U.S. companies with market caps over $4 billion, with up to 10% in non-U.S. equities. Featuring approximately 58 holdings, CGDV employs Capital Group's collaborative research for stock selection, focusing on firms with strong balance sheets and dividend potential. Top holdings include MSFT (5.7%), NVDA (5.2%), AVGO (4.5%), AMAT (3.9%), and RTX (3.7%). Sector allocations emphasize information technology (27%), industrials (17%), and healthcare (14%), with portfolio turnover at 29%. The expense ratio is 0.33%, and it trades on NYSE Arca with tight 0.02% bid-ask spreads, underscoring strong liquidity.
The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD), inception October 2011, passively tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, targeting high-yield U.S. stocks with consistent payments and strong financial ratios. It holds 101 stocks, investing at least 90% in index components, with individual caps at 4% and sector limits at 25% for diversification. Top holdings comprise LMT (4.9%), COP (4.8%), CVX (4.4%), VZ (4.4%), and BMY (4.2%). Sectors are led by energy (21%), consumer defensive (19%), healthcare (16%), and industrials (11%). Annual reconstitution and quarterly rebalancing maintain alignment, with 28% turnover. SCHD's expense ratio is a mere 0.06%, enhancing long-term efficiency on NYSE Arca.
Dividend strategies thrive in volatile environments, bolstered by sector tailwinds like energy resilience amid geopolitical tensions and commodity strength, alongside defensive consumer staples amid slowing growth. Macro drivers include persistent inflation, Fed rate path uncertainty, and capital flows into quality yield amid bond volatility. Regulatory focus on corporate payouts remains supportive, while risks encompass earnings pressures in cyclicals and dividend cuts in overextended firms. Both ETFs benefit from U.S. large-cap stability but face sector rotation risks—tech momentum for CGDV, energy defensiveness for SCHD—in a landscape favoring income with moderate growth.
In recent months, SCHD has demonstrated relative strength through defensive rotations, supported by energy and staples amid market volatility, while CGDV's technology overweight propelled gains in growth-favoring cycles but trailed during value shifts. Over broader periods since CGDV's inception, its active approach has delivered superior total returns, though with higher volatility (beta ~0.84 vs. SCHD's 0.65). SCHD exhibits lower drawdowns in risk-off environments due to quality screens, while CGDV benefits from industrials and tech momentum tied to earnings cycles and AI trends. Relative positioning highlights SCHD's edge in stability, CGDV in upside capture.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like trend-following, mean reversion, and momentum, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns. Only the strongest, real-time performers rise to this curated section, helping traders identify tools aligned with current volatility, sector shifts, or macro trends. Explore these bots to automate strategies on ETFs like CGDV and SCHD, potentially enhancing decision-making with data-driven signals.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors SCHD for its superior cost efficiency, broader diversification, lower volatility, and alignment with defensive sector momentum in uncertain cycles. While CGDV's active growth tilt shows trend consistency in bull phases, SCHD's structural quality and income profile offer higher probability of relative outperformance amid rate volatility and rotation risks (~65% edge based on backtested factors).
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| CGDV | SCHD | CGDV / SCHD | |
| Gain YTD | 2.656 | 13.750 | 19% |
| Net Assets | 31B | 85.9B | 36% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.06 | 550% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 30.00 | 97% |
| Yield | 1.34 | 3.44 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 14 years | - |
| CGDV | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 68% | 29 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGDV has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGDV jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGDV | 100% | +0.63% | ||
| NVDA - CGDV | 74% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| JPM - CGDV | 73% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| GEHC - CGDV | 72% Closely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| GE - CGDV | 71% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| COF - CGDV | 71% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
More | ||||