CGDV
Price
$44.68
Change
+$0.28 (+0.63%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Net Assets
31.04B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SCHD
Price
$30.94
Change
+$0.08 (+0.26%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Net Assets
85.95B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGDV vs SCHD

Header iconCGDV vs SCHD Comparison
Open Charts CGDV vs SCHDBanner chart's image
CGDV vs SCHD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) vs. Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD)

Key Takeaways

  • CGDV is actively managed with ~58 holdings and heavy technology exposure (27%), emphasizing growth-oriented dividend payers, while SCHD is passive, tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index with 101 holdings focused on high-quality, sustainable dividends.
  • Expense ratio difference is notable: CGDV at 0.33% vs. SCHD's ultra-low 0.06%, favoring SCHD for cost efficiency over long horizons.
  • Sector profiles diverge sharply—CGDV overweight industrials (17%) and tech; SCHD tilts to energy (21%), consumer defensive (19%), and healthcare (16%) for defensive positioning.
  • CGDV offers higher total return potential through active stock selection but exhibits greater volatility; SCHD provides steadier income with lower beta (~0.65).
  • Top holdings reflect strategies: CGDV features MSFT (5.7%), NVDA (5.2%); SCHD emphasizes LMT (4.9%), COP (4.8%).
  • Both target dividend income exceeding broad market yields but suit different risk appetites—CGDV for growth-income blend, SCHD for pure income stability.

Introduction

CGDV and SCHD represent compelling options in the dividend ETF space, appealing to income-seeking investors amid shifting sector rotations and interest rate dynamics. While both prioritize U.S. large-cap dividend payers exceeding S&P 500 yields, they diverge structurally: CGDV's active management enables nimble exposure to growth-tilted names, contrasting SCHD's passive replication of a quality-focused index. This ETF comparison highlights their roles as alternatives for balancing income, growth, and risk in portfolios navigating economic uncertainty, inflation pressures, and potential rate cuts. Investors weigh CGDV's outperformance potential against SCHD's cost and stability advantages.

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) Overview

The Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV), launched in February 2022, is an actively managed fund seeking income exceeding the S&P 500 average yield alongside principal growth. It invests at least 80% in dividend-paying common stocks of U.S. companies with market caps over $4 billion, with up to 10% in non-U.S. equities. Featuring approximately 58 holdings, CGDV employs Capital Group's collaborative research for stock selection, focusing on firms with strong balance sheets and dividend potential. Top holdings include MSFT (5.7%), NVDA (5.2%), AVGO (4.5%), AMAT (3.9%), and RTX (3.7%). Sector allocations emphasize information technology (27%), industrials (17%), and healthcare (14%), with portfolio turnover at 29%. The expense ratio is 0.33%, and it trades on NYSE Arca with tight 0.02% bid-ask spreads, underscoring strong liquidity.

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) Overview

The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD), inception October 2011, passively tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, targeting high-yield U.S. stocks with consistent payments and strong financial ratios. It holds 101 stocks, investing at least 90% in index components, with individual caps at 4% and sector limits at 25% for diversification. Top holdings comprise LMT (4.9%), COP (4.8%), CVX (4.4%), VZ (4.4%), and BMY (4.2%). Sectors are led by energy (21%), consumer defensive (19%), healthcare (16%), and industrials (11%). Annual reconstitution and quarterly rebalancing maintain alignment, with 28% turnover. SCHD's expense ratio is a mere 0.06%, enhancing long-term efficiency on NYSE Arca.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Dividend strategies thrive in volatile environments, bolstered by sector tailwinds like energy resilience amid geopolitical tensions and commodity strength, alongside defensive consumer staples amid slowing growth. Macro drivers include persistent inflation, Fed rate path uncertainty, and capital flows into quality yield amid bond volatility. Regulatory focus on corporate payouts remains supportive, while risks encompass earnings pressures in cyclicals and dividend cuts in overextended firms. Both ETFs benefit from U.S. large-cap stability but face sector rotation risks—tech momentum for CGDV, energy defensiveness for SCHD—in a landscape favoring income with moderate growth.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, SCHD has demonstrated relative strength through defensive rotations, supported by energy and staples amid market volatility, while CGDV's technology overweight propelled gains in growth-favoring cycles but trailed during value shifts. Over broader periods since CGDV's inception, its active approach has delivered superior total returns, though with higher volatility (beta ~0.84 vs. SCHD's 0.65). SCHD exhibits lower drawdowns in risk-off environments due to quality screens, while CGDV benefits from industrials and tech momentum tied to earnings cycles and AI trends. Relative positioning highlights SCHD's edge in stability, CGDV in upside capture.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like trend-following, mean reversion, and momentum, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns. Only the strongest, real-time performers rise to this curated section, helping traders identify tools aligned with current volatility, sector shifts, or macro trends. Explore these bots to automate strategies on ETFs like CGDV and SCHD, potentially enhancing decision-making with data-driven signals.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SCHD for its superior cost efficiency, broader diversification, lower volatility, and alignment with defensive sector momentum in uncertain cycles. While CGDV's active growth tilt shows trend consistency in bull phases, SCHD's structural quality and income profile offer higher probability of relative outperformance amid rate volatility and rotation risks (~65% edge based on backtested factors).

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CGDV vs. SCHD commentary
Apr 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGDV is a Buy and SCHD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHD has more net assets: 85.9B vs. CGDV (31B). SCHD has a higher annual dividend yield than CGDV: SCHD (13.750) vs CGDV (2.656). CGDV was incepted earlier than SCHD: CGDV (4 years) vs SCHD (14 years). SCHD (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than CGDV (0.33). SCHD (30.00) and CGDV (29.00) have matching turnover.
CGDVSCHDCGDV / SCHD
Gain YTD2.65613.75019%
Net Assets31B85.9B36%
Total Expense Ratio0.330.06550%
Turnover29.0030.0097%
Yield1.343.4439%
Fund Existence4 years14 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGDVSCHD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGDV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCHD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PWRD106.080.89
+0.85%
TCW Transform Systems ETF
GSEP39.030.15
+0.38%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Sep
HYD51.060.18
+0.35%
VanEck High Yield Muni ETF
FLDZ29.71N/A
N/A
RiverNorth Patriot ETF
PYZ124.77-0.14
-0.11%
Invesco DW Basic Materials Momt ETF

CGDV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGDV has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGDV jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGDV
1D Price
Change %
CGDV100%
+0.63%
NVDA - CGDV
74%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
JPM - CGDV
73%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
GEHC - CGDV
72%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
GE - CGDV
71%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
COF - CGDV
71%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
More