Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGEZX vs CNPAX
CGEZX vs CNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CGEZX vs CNPAX
CGEZX vs CNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGEZX vs. CNPAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGEZX is a Buy and CNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. CGEZX (818M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than CGEZX: CNPAX (0.97) vs CGEZX (0.44). CGEZX was incepted earlier than CNPAX: CGEZX (16 years) vs CNPAX (24 years). CGEZX (0.98) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CGEZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGEZX: CNPAX (250) vs CGEZX (2000). CGEZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.12 vs. CNPAX (6.66). CGEZX return over 5 years is better than : 13.58 vs. CNPAX (12.85).
| CGEZX | CNPAX | CGEZX / CNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.74 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.74 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.105 | 4.921 | 287% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 818M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.97 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.12 | 6.66 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.20 | 33.46 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.58 | 12.85 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.08 | 113.25 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers