Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGEZX vs NPFCX
CGEZX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CGEZX vs NPFCX
CGEZX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGEZX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGEZX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. CGEZX (831M). CGEZX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: CGEZX (0.43) vs NPFCX (0.33). CGEZX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CGEZX (16 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CGEZX (0.98). CGEZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGEZX: NPFCX (250) vs CGEZX (2000). CGEZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.04 vs. NPFCX (6.26). CGEZX return over 5 years is better than : 15.98 vs. NPFCX (8.52).
| CGEZX | NPFCX | CGEZX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.47 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.47 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.613 | 4.931 | 317% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 831M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.33 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.04 | 6.26 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.95 | 30.32 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.98 | 8.52 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.54 | 96.35 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement