Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGEZX vs RNPAX
CGEZX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CGEZX vs RNPAX
CGEZX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGEZX vs. RNPAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGEZX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. CGEZX (831M). CGEZX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: CGEZX (0.43) vs RNPAX (0.37). CGEZX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: CGEZX (16 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than CGEZX (0.98). CGEZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGEZX: RNPAX (250) vs CGEZX (2000). CGEZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.04 vs. RNPAX (6.13). CGEZX return over 5 years is better than : 15.98 vs. RNPAX (8.01).
| CGEZX | RNPAX | CGEZX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.49 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.49 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.613 | 4.905 | 318% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 831M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.37 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.04 | 6.13 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.95 | 29.92 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.98 | 8.01 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.54 | 95.18 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement