Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs CGTRX
CGFAX vs CGTRX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs CGTRX
CGFAX vs CGTRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. CGTRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and CGTRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. CGTRX (495M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than CGTRX: CGFAX (0.23) vs CGTRX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than CGTRX: CGFAX (25 years) vs CGTRX (14 years). CGTRX (0.87) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGTRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: CGTRX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.14 vs. CGFAX (-0.03). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.11 vs. CGTRX (-39.03).
| CGFAX | CGTRX | CGFAX / CGTRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.70 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.87 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.063 | 10.301 | 88% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 495M | 71,313% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.03 | 2.14 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.54 | -1.65 | -2,577% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.11 | -39.03 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.83 | -43.37 | -256% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement