Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs EAALX
CGFAX vs EAALX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs EAALX
CGFAX vs EAALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. EAALX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and EAALX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. EAALX (506M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than EAALX: CGFAX (0.23) vs EAALX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than EAALX: CGFAX (24 years) vs EAALX (23 years). EAALX (1.02) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. EAALX (11.00). EAALX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAALX: CGFAX (250) vs EAALX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. EAALX (-17.05). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. EAALX (3.11).
| CGFAX | EAALX | CGFAX / EAALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.02 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.02 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | -12.126 | -72% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 506M | 71,344% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | -17.05 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | 2.76 | 1,747% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | 3.11 | 610% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | 47.20 | 260% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement