Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs EAALX
CGFAX vs EAALX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs EAALX
CGFAX vs EAALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. EAALX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and EAALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. EAALX (468M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than EAALX: CGFAX (0.24) vs EAALX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than EAALX: CGFAX (25 years) vs EAALX (23 years). EAALX (1.02) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. EAALX (11.00). EAALX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAALX: CGFAX (250) vs EAALX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. EAALX (-10.69). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.11 vs. EAALX (5.30).
| CGFAX | EAALX | CGFAX / EAALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.02 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.02 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.418 | -1.522 | -619% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 468M | 73,077% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | -10.69 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.86 | 12.89 | 364% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.11 | 5.30 | 323% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.74 | 53.25 | 199% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement