Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs EAFGX
CGFAX vs EAFGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs EAFGX
CGFAX vs EAFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. EAFGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and EAFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. EAFGX (117M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than EAFGX: CGFAX (0.23) vs EAFGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than EAFGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs EAFGX (15 years). EAFGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. EAFGX (25.00). EAFGX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFGX: CGFAX (250) vs EAFGX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. EAFGX (-5.83). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. EAFGX (-22.94).
| CGFAX | EAFGX | CGFAX / EAFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.05 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.08 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | 5.414 | 161% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 117M | 308,547% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | -5.83 | -205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | 32.07 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | -22.94 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | 70.88 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement