Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs EAGCX
CGFAX vs EAGCX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs EAGCX
CGFAX vs EAGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. EAGCX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and EAGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. EAGCX (463M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than EAGCX: CGFAX (0.23) vs EAGCX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than EAGCX: CGFAX (25 years) vs EAGCX (15 years). EAGCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. EAGCX (11.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAGCX: CGFAX (250) vs EAGCX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.22 vs. EAGCX (-15.51). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.78 vs. EAGCX (-4.21).
| CGFAX | EAGCX | CGFAX / EAGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.77 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.77 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.353 | -4.375 | -191% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 463M | 76,242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.22 | -15.51 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.60 | 3.42 | 1,244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.78 | -4.21 | -280% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.60 | 34.06 | 316% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers