CGFAX
Price
$85.10
Change
-$0.84 (-0.98%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
360.63B
ECFGX
Price
$19.41
Change
-$0.25 (-1.27%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
110.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGFAX vs ECFGX

CGFAX vs ECFGX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGFAX vs. ECFGX commentary
Jul 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and ECFGX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. ECFGX (111M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than ECFGX: CGFAX (0.23) vs ECFGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than ECFGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs ECFGX (15 years). ECFGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ECFGX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFGX: CGFAX (250) vs ECFGX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.95 vs. ECFGX (-18.17). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.70 vs. ECFGX (-37.51).
CGFAXECFGXCGFAX / ECFGX
Total Expense Ratio0.621.8034%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio0.621.8334%
Fund Existence24 years15 years-
Gain YTD7.8722.050384%
Front Load4%N/A-
Min. Initial Investment250100025%
Min. Initial Investment IRAN/AN/A-
Net Assets361B111M325,225%
Annual Yield % from dividends0.230.00-
Returns for 1 year5.95-18.17-33%
Returns for 3 years43.2214.85291%
Returns for 5 years15.70-37.51-42%
Returns for 10 years114.5529.92383%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRTNX83.050.92
+1.12%
Bretton Fund
FSGEX20.730.05
+0.24%
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
IHOAX23.770.05
+0.21%
Hartford International Opportunities A
TAAEX43.25-0.54
-1.23%
Transamerica Capital Growth R
CNWIX31.32-1.33
-4.07%
Calamos Evolving World Growth I