Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FCAKX
CGFAX vs FCAKX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FCAKX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$87.57
Change-$0.13 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.07B
Fidelity Capital Appreciation K
Price$48.88
Change-$0.21 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.14B
CGFAX vs FCAKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FCAKX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and FCAKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. FCAKX (7.14B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than FCAKX: CGFAX (0.31) vs FCAKX (0.20). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FCAKX: CGFAX (24 years) vs FCAKX (17 years). CGFAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FCAKX (0.49). FCAKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). FCAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FCAKX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.71 vs. FCAKX (-0.99). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.50 vs. FCAKX (19.36).
| CGFAX | FCAKX | CGFAX / FCAKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.49 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.49 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.697 | 15.778 | 125% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 7.14B | 4,807% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.20 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.71 | -0.99 | -1,384% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.03 | 48.97 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.50 | 19.36 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.27 | 40.00 | 276% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement