Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FCAKX
CGFAX vs FCAKX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FCAKX
CGFAX vs FCAKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FCAKX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and FCAKX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FCAKX (7.83B). FCAKX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: FCAKX (0.63) vs CGFAX (0.24). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FCAKX: CGFAX (25 years) vs FCAKX (18 years). CGFAX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FCAKX (0.58). FCAKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). FCAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FCAKX (0) vs CGFAX (250). FCAKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.23 vs. CGFAX (5.42). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.11 vs. FCAKX (14.45).
| CGFAX | FCAKX | CGFAX / FCAKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.58 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.58 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.418 | 17.902 | 53% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 7.83B | 4,366% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.63 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 19.23 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.86 | 47.84 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.11 | 14.45 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.74 | 67.89 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers