Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FCAKX
CGFAX vs FCAKX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FCAKX
CGFAX vs FCAKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FCAKX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and FCAKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FCAKX (7.99B). FCAKX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: FCAKX (0.63) vs CGFAX (0.23). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FCAKX: CGFAX (24 years) vs FCAKX (18 years). CGFAX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FCAKX (0.58). FCAKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). FCAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FCAKX (0) vs CGFAX (250). FCAKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.90 vs. CGFAX (11.97). CGFAX (18.99) and FCAKX (18.50) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CGFAX | FCAKX | CGFAX / FCAKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.58 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.58 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | 17.773 | 49% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 7.99B | 4,519% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.63 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | 26.90 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | 50.04 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | 18.50 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | 84.28 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement