Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FCGSX
CGFAX vs FCGSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FCGSX
CGFAX vs FCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FCGSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and FCGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FCGSX (24.5B). FCGSX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: FCGSX (0.36) vs CGFAX (0.23). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FCGSX: CGFAX (24 years) vs FCGSX (13 years). CGFAX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FCGSX (0.00). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FCGSX (30.00). FCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FCGSX (0) vs CGFAX (250). FCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.15 vs. CGFAX (11.97). FCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 32.41 vs. CGFAX (18.99).
| CGFAX | FCGSX | CGFAX / FCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | 23.734 | 37% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 24.5B | 1,473% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.36 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | 42.15 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | 90.12 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | 32.41 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | 190.78 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement