Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FDCAX
CGFAX vs FDCAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FDCAX
CGFAX vs FDCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FDCAX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and FDCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FDCAX (8.02B). FDCAX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: FDCAX (0.56) vs CGFAX (0.23). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FDCAX: CGFAX (25 years) vs FDCAX (40 years). FDCAX (0.66) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). FDCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). FDCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FDCAX (0) vs CGFAX (250). FDCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.11 vs. CGFAX (3.16). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.04 vs. FDCAX (10.19).
| CGFAX | FDCAX | CGFAX / FDCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.66 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.66 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.204 | 18.158 | 56% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 8.02B | 4,263% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.56 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.16 | 18.11 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.45 | 42.95 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.04 | 10.19 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.27 | 69.16 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement