Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FDCAX
CGFAX vs FDCAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FDCAX
CGFAX vs FDCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FDCAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and FDCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FDCAX (7.99B). FDCAX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: FDCAX (0.57) vs CGFAX (0.23). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FDCAX: CGFAX (24 years) vs FDCAX (40 years). FDCAX (0.66) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). FDCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). FDCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FDCAX (0) vs CGFAX (250). FDCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.44 vs. CGFAX (8.47). FDCAX (15.85) and CGFAX (15.54) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CGFAX | FDCAX | CGFAX / FDCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.66 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.66 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.338 | 16.620 | 38% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 7.99B | 4,519% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.57 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.47 | 24.44 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.92 | 48.10 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.54 | 15.85 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.73 | 81.17 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement