Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FMFMX
CGFAX vs FMFMX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FMFMX
CGFAX vs FMFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FMFMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and FMFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FMFMX (1.61B). FMFMX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: FMFMX (0.69) vs CGFAX (0.23). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FMFMX: CGFAX (24 years) vs FMFMX (12 years). CGFAX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FMFMX (0.00). FMFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). FMFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FMFMX (0) vs CGFAX (250). FMFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. CGFAX (11.97). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. FMFMX (3.78).
| CGFAX | FMFMX | CGFAX / FMFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | 13.312 | 65% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1.61B | 22,450% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.69 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | 13.05 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | 27.29 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | 3.78 | 503% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | 79.45 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement