Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FRGSX
CGFAX vs FRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FRGSX
CGFAX vs FRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FRGSX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and FRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FRGSX (17.4B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than FRGSX: CGFAX (0.24) vs FRGSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FRGSX: CGFAX (24 years) vs FRGSX (31 years). FRGSX (1.53) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FRGSX (8.28). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRGSX: CGFAX (250) vs FRGSX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. FRGSX (-6.13). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.19 vs. FRGSX (-18.62).
| CGFAX | FRGSX | CGFAX / FRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.53 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.53 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.590 | 5.828 | 96% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 17.4B | 2,052% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.42 | -6.13 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.41 | 6.78 | 522% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.19 | -18.62 | -71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.59 | 57.39 | 180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers