Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FRGSX
CGFAX vs FRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FRGSX
CGFAX vs FRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FRGSX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and FRGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FRGSX (17.5B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than FRGSX: CGFAX (0.24) vs FRGSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FRGSX: CGFAX (25 years) vs FRGSX (31 years). FRGSX (1.53) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FRGSX (8.28). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRGSX: CGFAX (250) vs FRGSX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. FRGSX (-4.22). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.11 vs. FRGSX (-17.66).
| CGFAX | FRGSX | CGFAX / FRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.53 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.53 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.418 | 7.892 | 119% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 17.5B | 1,954% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | -4.22 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.86 | 13.85 | 338% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.11 | -17.66 | -97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.74 | 57.64 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement