Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FRGSX
CGFAX vs FRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FRGSX
CGFAX vs FRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FRGSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and FRGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FRGSX (17.5B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than FRGSX: CGFAX (0.23) vs FRGSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FRGSX: CGFAX (24 years) vs FRGSX (31 years). FRGSX (1.53) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FRGSX (8.28). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRGSX: CGFAX (250) vs FRGSX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.20 vs. FRGSX (-3.98). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.81 vs. FRGSX (-17.50).
| CGFAX | FRGSX | CGFAX / FRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.53 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.53 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.149 | 6.231 | 115% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 17.5B | 2,040% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.20 | -3.98 | -106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.95 | 7.88 | 494% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.81 | -17.50 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.94 | 59.12 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers