Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FTQGX
CGFAX vs FTQGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FTQGX
CGFAX vs FTQGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FTQGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and FTQGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FTQGX (5.1B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than FTQGX: CGFAX (0.24) vs FTQGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FTQGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs FTQGX (30 years). FTQGX (0.69) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). FTQGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 153.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). FTQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FTQGX (0) vs CGFAX (250). FTQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.08 vs. CGFAX (1.42). FTQGX return over 5 years is better than : 29.14 vs. CGFAX (13.19).
| CGFAX | FTQGX | CGFAX / FTQGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.69 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.69 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.590 | 19.828 | 28% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 5.1B | 6,999% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.42 | 13.08 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.41 | 57.60 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.19 | 29.14 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.59 | 147.85 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement