Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FTRNX
CGFAX vs FTRNX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FTRNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$87.70
Change+$0.66 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
CGFAX vs FTRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FTRNX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and FTRNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. FTRNX (4.55B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: FTRNX (0.51) vs CGFAX (0.31). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FTRNX: CGFAX (24 years) vs FTRNX (67 years). CGFAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FTRNX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.68 vs. FTRNX (7.61). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 46.77 vs. CGFAX (42.71).
| CGFAX | FTRNX | CGFAX / FTRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 67 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.874 | 15.085 | 132% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 4.55B | 7,503% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.51 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.68 | 7.61 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.31 | 88.23 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.71 | 46.77 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.97 | 147.05 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers