Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FTRNX
CGFAX vs FTRNX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FTRNX
CGFAX vs FTRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FTRNX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and FTRNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FTRNX (4.62B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than FTRNX: CGFAX (0.23) vs FTRNX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FTRNX: CGFAX (25 years) vs FTRNX (68 years). FTRNX (0.74) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FTRNX (0) vs CGFAX (250). FTRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.76 vs. CGFAX (1.17). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 26.74 vs. CGFAX (13.60).
| CGFAX | FTRNX | CGFAX / FTRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.74 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.74 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 68 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.532 | 9.884 | 96% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 4.62B | 7,636% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.17 | 6.76 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.25 | 53.02 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.60 | 26.74 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.49 | 152.24 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers