Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs HSUCX
CGFAX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs HSUCX
CGFAX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. HSUCX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and HSUCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. HSUCX (51.7M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: CGFAX (0.23) vs HSUCX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: CGFAX (24 years) vs HSUCX (13 years). HSUCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 267.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: CGFAX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. HSUCX (-6.93). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.30 vs. HSUCX (-16.46).
| CGFAX | HSUCX | CGFAX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.12 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.12 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.013 | -4.084 | -221% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 51.7M | 698,259% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | -6.93 | -87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.56 | 42.66 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.30 | -16.46 | -105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.17 | -17.84 | -640% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers