Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs HSUCX
CGFAX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs HSUCX
CGFAX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. HSUCX commentary
Jul 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and HSUCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. HSUCX (48.9M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: CGFAX (0.23) vs HSUCX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: CGFAX (24 years) vs HSUCX (13 years). HSUCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 267.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: CGFAX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.54 vs. HSUCX (-9.40). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.78 vs. HSUCX (-18.75).
| CGFAX | HSUCX | CGFAX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.12 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.12 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.408 | -7.240 | -33% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 48.9M | 730,061% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.54 | -9.40 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.18 | 30.18 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.78 | -18.75 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.12 | -20.96 | -459% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement