Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs IAFLX
CGFAX vs IAFLX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs IAFLX
CGFAX vs IAFLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. IAFLX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and IAFLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. IAFLX (103M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than IAFLX: CGFAX (0.23) vs IAFLX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than IAFLX: CGFAX (24 years) vs IAFLX (10 years). IAFLX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). IAFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IAFLX: CGFAX (250) vs IAFLX (100000). IAFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.25 vs. CGFAX (14.80). IAFLX return over 5 years is better than : 32.66 vs. CGFAX (25.03).
| CGFAX | IAFLX | CGFAX / IAFLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.92 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.13 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.432 | 33.550 | 31% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 103M | 328,155% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.80 | 35.25 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.03 | 85.75 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.03 | 32.66 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement