Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs IRLNX
CGFAX vs IRLNX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs IRLNX
CGFAX vs IRLNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. IRLNX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and IRLNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. IRLNX (1.53B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than IRLNX: CGFAX (0.23) vs IRLNX (0.12). CGFAX was incepted earlier than IRLNX: CGFAX (24 years) vs IRLNX (17 years). IRLNX (0.64) and CGFAX (0.62) have similar cost to investors . IRLNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). IRLNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: IRLNX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.20 vs. IRLNX (-2.00). IRLNX return over 5 years is better than : 18.20 vs. CGFAX (15.81).
| CGFAX | IRLNX | CGFAX / IRLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.43 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.64 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.149 | -12.162 | -59% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 1.53B | 23,318% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.12 | 200% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.20 | -2.00 | -210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.95 | 30.43 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.81 | 18.20 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.94 | 202.54 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement