Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs MCGIX
CGFAX vs MCGIX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs MCGIX
CGFAX vs MCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. MCGIX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and MCGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. MCGIX (214M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than MCGIX: CGFAX (0.24) vs MCGIX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than MCGIX: CGFAX (25 years) vs MCGIX (30 years). MCGIX (0.79) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). MCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGIX: CGFAX (250) vs MCGIX (100000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.35 vs. MCGIX (-11.73). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.87 vs. MCGIX (-25.74).
| CGFAX | MCGIX | CGFAX / MCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.73 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.79 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.203 | 21.332 | 43% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 214M | 159,813% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.35 | -11.73 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.84 | 11.72 | 408% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.87 | -25.74 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.91 | -37.77 | -280% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement