Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs MLACX
CGFAX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs MLACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$87.13
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$4.89
Change-$0.02 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.89B
CGFAX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. MLACX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and MLACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. MLACX (13.9B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than MLACX: CGFAX (0.31) vs MLACX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than MLACX: CGFAX (24 years) vs MLACX (21 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: CGFAX (250) vs MLACX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.65 vs. MLACX (-18.64). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.88 vs. MLACX (-43.14).
| CGFAX | MLACX | CGFAX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.88 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.89 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.095 | 13.986 | 137% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 13.9B | 2,453% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.65 | -18.64 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.11 | -5.60 | -1,217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.88 | -43.14 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.39 | -46.20 | -245% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement