Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs MLACX
CGFAX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs MLACX
CGFAX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. MLACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and MLACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MLACX (12.7B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than MLACX: CGFAX (0.23) vs MLACX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than MLACX: CGFAX (24 years) vs MLACX (21 years). MLACX (1.86) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: CGFAX (250) vs MLACX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. MLACX (-35.71). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. MLACX (-70.46).
| CGFAX | MLACX | CGFAX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.85 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.86 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | 4.727 | 184% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 12.7B | 2,843% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | -35.71 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | -44.19 | -109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | -70.46 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | -62.60 | -196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement