Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs MRLSX
CGFAX vs MRLSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs MRLSX
CGFAX vs MRLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. MRLSX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and MRLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MRLSX (132M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than MRLSX: CGFAX (0.23) vs MRLSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than MRLSX: CGFAX (24 years) vs MRLSX (17 years). MRLSX (0.84) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). MRLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MRLSX: CGFAX (250) vs MRLSX (100000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. MRLSX (-6.63). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.30 vs. MRLSX (1.59).
| CGFAX | MRLSX | CGFAX / MRLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.73 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.84 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.013 | 4.066 | 222% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 132M | 273,485% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | -6.63 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.56 | 11.74 | 397% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.30 | 1.59 | 1,088% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.17 | 68.62 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement